Autodesk Construction Cloud for Contractors and Owners
Autodesk Construction Cloud by Autodesk · San Francisco, CA
Project management and document control platform built for general contractors, owners, and specialty trades managing complex builds.
In-Depth Review
Autodesk Construction Cloud consolidates what was previously a fragmented set of products (BIM 360 Field, BIM 360 Docs, PlanGrid) into a single platform. The consolidation is mostly complete as of 2025: document control, RFI/submittal workflows, BIM coordination, cost management, and field reporting all live under one login and one URL structure.
What ACC Actually Does
The platform’s strongest module is document control. Construction drawings and specs are stored centrally, versioned automatically, and accessible to field crews on mobile without a manual download step. When a drawing revision comes in, the new sheet replaces the old one in the document set, and anyone who had the previous version flagged in their set sees the update. This sounds basic, but it solves the version confusion problem that causes expensive field mistakes on complex projects.
RFI and submittal workflows are structured around configurable routing chains. An RFI gets created, assigned to the responsible design team contact, and tracked to a response due date. When the response comes in, it links to the relevant drawing sheet automatically. Submittals follow the same pattern with approval status tracked per revision. Both workflows produce an audit trail that matters when disputes arise at project closeout.
BIM coordination is browser-based, which is the key operational difference from Navisworks. Trade contractors upload their models to ACC, the platform aggregates them, and coordinators run clash detection in a browser session. Clashes get logged as issues, assigned to a responsible trade, and tracked to resolution. A mechanical coordinator on a healthcare project can work through a clash review without installing software beyond a browser, which matters when you are coordinating across 8-10 subcontractors with different IT environments.
Cost Management requires more setup than the other modules. Before it reflects actual project cost flow, someone has to configure the budget structure, set up change event types, and establish the workflow for how potential change orders escalate to executed change orders. Teams that skip this setup end up with a generic budget structure that does not match their contract. Teams that invest two to three weeks in configuration get a system that tracks committed costs, forecast-to-complete, and change order status in one place.
Field issues and punch lists work through the mobile app. A superintendent walks the site, takes a photo of a problem, pins it to a drawing sheet, assigns it to the responsible subcontractor, and sets a due date. The subcontractor receives a notification, fixes the issue, photos the completed work, and closes it. The superintendent verifies. Full photo history per issue is kept automatically. This is the workflow most field teams adopt fastest because it requires almost no training.
Pricing Reality
Autodesk does not publish ACC pricing. Quotes are negotiated by company size, project volume, and which modules you need. The practical implication: you need to go through a sales cycle before you can budget for it. Get pricing in writing early if you are evaluating against Procore or another platform with published rates. Enterprise contracts typically include volume discounts for firms running multiple active projects simultaneously.
One Thing to Test Before Committing
During the demo or pilot, run a real RFI from creation through response. Use an actual RFI from a current or recent project. Evaluate whether the routing chain matches how your design team works, whether the response links correctly to the affected sheet, and whether the audit trail gives you what you would need if the RFI became a change event. RFI workflow quality separates construction management platforms faster than any other single test.
Who This Is For
General contractors running commercial, institutional, or infrastructure projects above $10M get the most out of ACC, particularly if their design team uses Revit. The design-to-field document flow is more direct when models are authored in Autodesk tools. Owners managing multiple simultaneous capital projects also benefit from the single portal for tracking RFI and submittal status across several GCs. Small residential contractors, remodelers, or any team without a BIM workflow will find the platform over-specified for their needs and the pricing hard to justify.
+ Strengths
- Document control quality is the platform's strongest attribute: versioning, transmittals, and markup tools are mature and cover most GC workflows
- Browser-based BIM coordination reduces the hardware and software overhead compared to desktop-only coordination workflows
- Mobile offline capability is genuinely useful on sites where cell coverage is inconsistent
− Limitations
- Opaque pricing makes it hard to budget without going through a sales cycle; get a written quote before planning annual software spend
- Cost Management requires investment to configure correctly; teams that rush setup end up with a budget structure that does not match their actual work breakdown
- Migration from BIM 360 is not automatic; plan for a cleanup sprint if moving active projects
Key Use Cases
Running RFI and submittal workflows with automatic routing to architects and engineers, due-date alerts, and linking to affected drawing sheets
Giving subcontractors access to current drawings on mobile without manual PDF distribution or version confusion
Running clash detection on aggregated trade models in a browser session without distributing Navisworks licenses
Tracking change events from potential change order to executed change order with full cost impact history
Creating field issues from mobile, pinning them to drawing locations, and routing to responsible parties for resolution
Verdict
Autodesk Construction Cloud is a mature platform for general contractors and owners who need document control, BIM coordination, and field management in one place. The strongest case for it is teams already using Autodesk design tools, where the design-to-field workflow is more direct than with competing platforms. The weakest point is cost transparency: pricing requires a sales conversation, and total cost varies enough by contract that budgeting blind is not realistic. Evaluate it against Procore for your specific project mix before committing.
Pricing
Autodesk Build
Contact Sales
- ›Project management and scheduling
- ›RFI and submittal workflows
- ›Daily logs and field reporting
- ›Issues and punch list tracking
- ›Meeting minutes management
- ›Document control with version management
Autodesk Docs
Contact Sales
- ›Centralized document storage and sharing
- ›Version control and approval workflows
- ›Cross-project document access
- ›Markup and review tools
Autodesk Takeoff
Contact Sales
- ›2D and 3D quantity takeoff from PDFs and models
- ›Linked to project documents in Docs
- ›Export to Excel for estimating
Cost Management
Contact Sales
- ›Budget tracking and change order management
- ›Owner and subcontractor budget views
- ›Forecast-to-complete and committed cost tracking
- ›Integration with accounting systems